AUTO PARTS AND RAZOR BLADES

Last week, I made my bi-monthly trek to my favorite mega-discount-big-box-supply store too, well, stock up on essentials and maybe pick up a few non-essentials as well. Just can’t get enough of the garbage can lid size cheesecake sampler!

While loading the two-gallon canister of peanut butter into my cart, just squeezing it between the 45-stick butter box and the 5-pound bag of coffee, I noticed that I had razor blades on my list. Quickly calculating the distance on my handheld GPS device I found I was closer to the personal hygiene section by about a quarter mile than I was to the meat section, which was the next item on my list. So, off I trekked.

Upon arriving in the section, after having devoured approximately 10-12 delicious samples on the way, I quickly found the razor blades in between the gallon size canisters of shaving crème and barrels of anti-bacterial soap. This time I noticed some thing very different about the blades.

Each packet of blades was encased in a solid plastic shell much like what DVD’s or CD’s are. But this was no skimpy plastic. I’m not sure a .45 magnum bullet fired at close range could have penetrated this plastic – if it really was plastic at all.

I thought, what the heck is going on here?

Then I noticed the price.

$40 for a pack of razor blades!

My first reaction was to check and see if these were the right blades and not some gold encased diamond encrusted fifty-year anniversary blade or some thing.

No, they were my blades all right. But the price sure was not the same.

Now I have always thought razor blades were horrifically high priced. And why not, the company that makes them…. HAS A MONOPOLY ON THEM!

Heck the razor manufacturer practically gives the razors away. Once you have the razor you are locked in to buying their blades. They own you.

You can’t change to another razor company because they have a monopoly on their product as well. I will admit the other manufacturer did have a lower price though – two cents less.

Ah monopolies. No competition. Charge as much as you want. No care or thought into service or treating customers right.

It’s the same for other items as well. Think about color printers. Right now they are cheap and getting cheaper but the price of print cartridges keeps going higher and higher. Once again, the manufacturer owns you once you buy that “reasonably priced” printer.

Like razor blades and print cartridges the auto manufacturers crave that same monopoly. That is why they continue their national campaign to gain such a “razor blade type” monopoly.

Some time during my over twenty years in the automotive business, I heard a saying that was attributed to Henry Ford the first. Old Henry supposedly said that, “ I would give my cars away if I knew that people would have to come back to me to get all their parts.”

Now I have never been able to nail down this quote to Mr. Ford himself but I have had plenty of dealer folks over the years tell me basically the same thing.  One dealer guy even told me they should put the service department and garage out front and put the show room in the back because service and parts is where we, “make it.” I always assumed “make it,” meant money.

Makes sense does it not? Once you are the only game in town you can charge any price you want for your product and no one can do anything about it.

Just like my $ 40 dollar razor blades encased in a hard nuclear proof plastic shell because they are being shoplifted at an alarming rate.

Auto parts and razor blades. One has a monopoly, the other wants one.

Lets make sure the car manufacturers never get it.

IT IS THE SCARY TIME OF THE YEAR

Around the country, just about now, little children are anxiously anticipating putting on their scariest costumes and hitting the streets in search of candy. For weeks, and for some as long as a few months, the kids have been scanning costume catalogs looking for that perfect look that will scare the neighbors, along with their parents, brothers, sisters and friends into securing them as much candy as possible. It’s a kid’s celebration!

Or is it?

Turns out, its not just kids that like to scare the parents and neighbors this time of year.

Our friends, the car manufacturers, just love to scare people and they are at it again during this most frightening time of the year.

Mazda, following in the footsteps of their brethren Honda, Hyundai, Ford, GM, Chrysler and Toyota, has issued a public statement in which they “recommend” that consumers not use aftermarket parts when making repairs to their vehicles after an accident.

The statement says in part, “ Mazda North America Operations (MNAO) does not recommend the use of aftermarket parts for any Mazda maintenance or collision repair.” It continues, “ These aftermarket parts are generally made to a lower standard in order to cut costs and lack the testing required to determine their effectiveness in vehicle performance and safety”.

Even in this statement, the manufacturers don’t come right out and say that aftermarket parts are definitely inferior. They use the word “generally,” not stronger language like – always or every time. In other statements released by the manufacturers, they cover themselves by using words like could, might or may. They never come right out and say they are inferior. They can’t. That would not be the truth.

This campaign is not about the truth, it’s about scarring people and grabbing a monopoly for the car manufacturers.

Where is the evidence that these parts are inferior? Recent tests by independent testing companies have shown that in many cases, aftermarket parts preformed better than the original part. The only tests showing that aftermarket parts don’t perform correctly are those conducted by the car manufacturers themselves. How reliable can those be?

The car manufacturers claim that aftermarket parts are not tested. Wrong again. Aftermarket parts are tested by not only the company that manufactures the aftermarket parts, but also by several independent testing agencies and groups. These testing groups then certify the parts as comparable to the original part.

In addition, many of the aftermarket parts come from the same manufacturing plants and companies that manufacture the original parts. Believe it or not, just because it may say Ford or GM on the box, it does not mean that they actually manufactured it.

This is just more of the same old scare-tactic propaganda perpetrated by the manufacturers in their on-going national campaign to gain monopoly control over the sale and use of collision parts. It’s all about greed, greed and more greed.

Overall, the replacement market for collision parts amounts to around fifteen billion dollars a year. Currently, the original manufacturers have control of around 80% of this market. The remaining 20 % goes to the aftermarket and this piece amounts to three billion dollars. That’s big bucks folks and a huge motivation for the original manufacturers too grab it all using whatever methods it takes.

For years I have been saying that this monopoly grab is a coordinated campaign by the manufacturers. Many others, including the original manufacturers, have said it is not. But lets take a look at this.

When conducting a campaign that has various groups, organizations or companies involved, you want everyone talking about the same issues as much as possible. Talking from the same page if you will. To make sure this happens you put together what are called talking points. This is a simple list of issues that you wish to highlight in your campaign. Usually, you limit it to a few simple points. Once you have these points settled on, you distribute them to your cohorts and let them produce press releases, position papers and statements. This is what is happening with the car manufacturers.

I have gone back and looked at the statements produced by the car manufacturers and I have found some strong similarities, which clearly show that a coordinated campaign is underway. These are excerpts gleaned from the statements.

STATEMENT FROM HONDA – MARCH 18, 2008

“The original body parts used on a Honda automobile are designed and built to provide optimum fit, function, safety, and structural integrity. “

STATEMENT FROM CHRYSLER – DATE UNKOWN

“Chrysler LLC vehicles, systems and components are engineered, tested and manufactured to protect vehicle occupants based upon both government mandated and internal corporate requirements relative to durability, NVH, vehicle safety and occupant protection. “

STATEMENT FROM HONDA / ACURA – MARCH 22 2010

“ Honda and Acura vehicles are engineered and manufactured to exacting standards and as such are designed to help protect vehicle occupants in the event of a collision.”

STATEMENT FROM HYUNDAI – JULY 22, 2010

“Hyundai vehicles and Hyundai Genuine Parts are designed and manufactured to meet Hyundai’s exact engineering specifications and to protect vehicle occupants in collisions.”

STATEMENT FROM TOYOTA/LEXUS/SCION – NOVEMBER 11, 2010

“Toyota Lexus and Scion vehicles are engineered and manufactured as an integrated assembly of carefully designed and manufactured parts working as a system to provide predictable performance, safety and durability.”

STATEMENT FROM MAZDA – SEPTEMBER 29, 2011

“Mazda North American Operations (MNAO) recommends that all maintenance and collision repairs be performed using Genuine Mazda Parts in order to provide an optimum level of performance, safety and durability. Genuine Mazda Parts are made from the same blueprint as the original parts found in production vehicles, ensuring that each part is guaranteed to perform seamlessly and wear the same as the day the vehicle was built.”

These statements clearly appear to have been prepared from a template written by the same people. Each statement has the same main points woven throughout them showing a concerted effort on the part of the car manufacturers. It’s all right there for everyone too see.

Aftermarket parts have an unblemished sixty-year record of safety. Every year millions of consumers confidently chose aftermarket parts for their vehicles and those millions are rewarded with quality and affordability. Just what the car manufacturers do not want you to have.

This effort to scare the American consumer away from using aftermarket parts and gaining a clear monopoly is the scariest Halloween trick of all.

WHEN CAN YOU TRUST FORD – ANYMORE?

Back in the ‘80’s, for those of you who may be old enough to remember, Ford had a great slogan and jingle that they used in their commercials and promotions.

“Have You Driven A Ford – Lately”.

The tune ranks right up there with another enticing tune – ESPN’s introduction to their Sports Center show. You know the one; DA, DA, DA, – DA, DA, DA.

I can still remember the Ford tune well and now that I have brought it up, I will be humming and singing it for the next few days.

But that was then. Better days for Ford. Now we must ask, can anyone, or, anything coming from Ford be trusted?

For years now, Ford has been the leader of a national campaign by the car manufacturers to demonize automotive aftermarket parts along with anyone and everyone that would buy and use them on their vehicle.

According to Ford, aftermarket parts are never the same quality as their own manufactured parts. They claim aftermarket parts are always made of lower quality materials and they will never – ever – perform as well as the original equipment parts.

In an attempt to bolster and legitimize their claims and continue the demonization of aftermarket parts, Ford has produced a series of B grade Science Fiction quality type videos. These have been posted on You Tube for all to see.

But just as in those B grade Science Fiction movies, the monster here, Ford, which seems too big and strong, always right and indestructible, is in reality bloated, slow, dimwitted and doomed to defeat buy the good guys, in this case the aftermarket.

In one of the latest videos, Ford says, “genuine Ford collision replacement parts are the same as those used to manufacture the vehicle.” For this reason alone Ford implies their parts are better than any aftermarket part.

But it turns out that Fords statement that their service and production parts are the same made by Fords spokesman in the video and posted in bright red letters on the screen with him, turns out NOT to be true. Imagine that.

In tests conducted by NSF International, an accredited third party certification body, which has been around since 1944, shows huge discrepancies between the Ford production parts and Ford service parts.

First, a Ford bumper absorber, which adds shock resistance and resilience to your bumper, purchased from a dealer for a 2005-2009 Mustang was tested. The test clearly shows lower weight, density and hardness for the part when compared to the production part. This means the service part can’t absorb the same amount of energy as the original production part. Does that sound like the same part?

Next, two factory installed genuine manufactured production bumper isolators, which act as a shock absorber in a impact, were removed from a 2005-2009 Mustang and compared to the same service parts purchased at a dealership. The service parts weighed 72 percent less than the genuine part. I ask again, does that sound like the same part?

Additional testing on the parts showed even far more discrepancies between Ford production parts and service parts.

Ford service parts showed lower densities of as much as 79 percent which means that the parts you buy from your Ford dealer to repair your vehicle would absorb 83 percent less compression than the Ford production parts. Again and again I ask, do these sound like the “exact same parts” that Ford claims them to be?

No one, not even the hardest line car manufacturing loving supporter can claim these are the same parts. No way.

It’s nothing new. Last year I found that Ford brake parts showed weight differences between the production parts and service parts. So this difference is not just on crash parts. It includes internal hard parts as well.

Obviously the huge differences between Ford production and service parts show that material composition is not as crucial as Ford pontificates it to be. As I have stated many times over and over, these car company types, with Ford in the lead, are a bunch of sanctimonious and pompous folks that say one thing while really doing and producing some thing else.

In the car company world, where they are all kings and we their serfs, they don’t think there is anything wrong with being that way.

Testing by the Automotive Body Parts Association (ABPA) has shown over and over that aftermarket parts are safe and deliver the same, if not better, protection as car company parts all while saving the consumer money. The American way. That has been true yesterday, ten years ago and it will be tomorrow and into the future.

I started this article by talking about Fords popular old jingle from the 1980’s – “Have You Driven A Ford Lately.” Well now I have a new jingle for Ford. The new jingle should be sung as – sing it with me now -

“When Can You Trust Ford – Anymore.”

NAUGHTY NUMBSKULLS

Well, the Chrysler boys are at it again!

Ten months after the Fox Television affiliate in Detroit found a group of workers from the Jefferson North Plant, which assembles the Jeep Grand Cherokee, spending their lunch hour drinking alcohol and smoking pot, a follow-up investigation has found more of the same behavior at another Chrysler plant.

This time, a group of workers from Chrysler’s Trenton Engine Plant in Trenton, Michigan, were, once again captured on video during their lunch break drinking what appeared to be a variety of adult beverages while several were also smoking “cigarettes” that did not seem to come out of a name branded pack.

The workers were not on Chrysler plant property at the time of their lunch-party. However, they were just a few feet away from the United Auto Workers (UAW) meeting hall. I must ask, is there a roped off designated area for this activity at the UAW hall?

I know that perks, benefits and pay are out-of-control at the automakers but, I guess we all missed that part of the agreement with the UAW that allows workers to hang out at the hall during the work day using drugs and drinking alcohol.

Chrysler released a statement saying that the conduct captured on video was “unacceptable” and that the workers would be suspended without pay once they are identified. Wow – tough talk Chrysler.

With taxpayer money being used to bail out Chrysler and the UAW should we, the taxpayer, not expect better than this from our government owned company? As a taxpayer, and thereby a part owner of the company, I say FIRE THEM NOW!

How often is this happening? This is now twice in less than a year at just two plants in relative proximity to one another. How many more plants around the country have workers participating in adult liquid and wobble weed breaks during working hours?

Last year was the fourth worst year for auto recalls since they began keeping those records. How much of these recall problems could be due to auto workers that are drunk or high on the job? One has to ask.

Can you imagine the outcry from the car manufacturers if this activity had been found at a plant that manufactured aftermarket parts? They would be apoplectic and calling for the plant to be shut down because of the danger to the manufacturing process.

I’m sure that the majority of car company assembly workers at plants around the country are hard working and not engaging in this type of activity, at least I hope so. And, I hope that the workers caught engaging in this activity receive the help they need to move on with their lives – in some other career. But, once again, this shows that the OE’s have a lot of problems that they need to take care of before they spend their time denigrating and attacking the aftermarket.

GM CHAIRMAN AND CEO WANTS HIGHER TAXES ON EVERYONE – AND I’M NOT KIDDING OR MAKING IT UP.

All right, can any of you name the current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of General Motors (GM)?

Just raise your hand if you know who it is. He is the person appointed by the US Treasury Department to be their man on the General Motors Board of Directors after they became – Government Motors, a wholly owned subsidiary of the government. He moved from the Board to the CEO position then added the Chairmanship on January 1 of this year.

Daniel Akerson is the current CEO of GM. Even after their self-inflicted financial debacle, taxpayer bailout and government ownership Mr. Akerson still remains a real titan of industry and one of the most powerful businessmen in the country, if not the world.

Even though the GM CEO halo is a little tarnished and dinged up; he’s still the big guy on campus, the big cheese and the grand pooh-bah of an American corporate icon.

That’s why his recent comments in a Detroit News article are very perplexing, extremely disappointing and, to be quite honest, shockingly and totally dumbfounding.

Mr. Akerson believes that the government should raise – that’s right – raise the gas tax by as much as a dollar!

He believes that a higher gas tax will – force – the American consumer into buying smaller cars like the Chevy Cruze and electric Volt while also being part of a long term “ green” environmental policy.

But Mr. Akerson does not just stop with a gas tax. He also says, “ I think you need to cut the hell out of the budget and you’ve got to increase taxes – on everybody – including the middle class and the rich people”.

That’s just what we need. The government, using their power to tax, forcing us into buying a product and accepting a policy they have “chosen” for us. Can’t people make the right decisions for themselves? I know they can. If there ever is a contest over who can make the right decision  – the American people versus the government, my money is on the American people every time!

Mr. Akerson needs look no further than out his window at the devastating condition of Detroit to prove that more often than not, government makes terrible decisions.

In a deteriorating economic environment where gas prices remain over $ 4 in many areas of the country, including mine, the stupidest thing you could do is raise the gas tax, or, for that matter, any tax on anybody.

Perhaps Mr. Akerson really just wants to make sure there is plenty of taxpayer money available for GM the next time they need to be bailed out. GM already has received 50 billion dollars from the U.S. taxpayer and 9.5 billion from the Canadian government. They also received 17 billion for their financial arm GMAC. To date less than 10 billion has been paid back to the American people.

You take our money to bail you out of your self-inflicted mess, and then you want to reward us with higher taxes so you can sell your cars. Nice work if you can get it.

Some thing must happen to the brain of a person occupying the CEO chair at GM. You become so insulated from the world where real people work that you believe such a stupid thing like raising taxes on such important items like fuel and the middle class will actually benefit anyone, let alone help the economy.

This is major stupid. I mean, were talking Marie Antoinette stupid. Remember her? She was the Queen of France when the revolution in that country occurred around 1792. She was so out of touch with reality that when seeing her people wearing rags, starving and begging for bread to eat, told them too “ just eat cake”. That comment and that level of arrogance helped her receive a one-way trip to the Guillotin

Now please folks, I am not advocating the same treatment for Mr. Akerson. Believe me. But this kind of arrogance and thinking about higher taxes is just buffoonery at the highest level. Mr. Akerson needs to be held accountable for this kind of dimwitted thinking.

Jobs are scarce. The unemployment rate is listed at 9.2% and has been over 9% for 24 of the last 26 months. An ever-growing group of job seekers have given up trying to find a job, while many other workers are underemployed or only working part time.  Because these numbers are not factored into the overall public statistics, many economists believe the real unemployment rate could be as high as 20%. These are depression level numbers. Higher fuel costs are not helping the employment outlook any.

Every month prices are rising for all consumer items because of higher transportation costs linked to higher fuel costs. Even some thing innocuous like my garbage service has gone up in price. Three times over the last year-and-a-half my garbage service costs have risen because of “ fuel surcharge costs” and I’m sure it will happen again. That is money right out of my pocket.

My wife is a realtor. Home sales, as most working people know, are in the dumps and she has to work a lot harder over much longer hours just to hang on. This extra work calls for additional driving to show properties to the ever-dwindling pool of clients. The higher fuel costs means less money in her pocket when she can make a sale. That hurts.

Food costs are rising due in large part to higher fuel costs for transportation and the actual farming itself.

Higher fuel costs affect everyone everyday in every way. Family income is dropping partially because of higher fuel and food costs. We are not going to tax ourselves back into prosperity or lower prices.

The CATO Institute, a respected Washington DC based think tank that advocates for individual liberty and free markets, has advocated for the total elimination of the current fuel tax. They made this call as far back as 2007. I agree with this approach. The fuel tax does very little in helping the environment and eliminating the tax will lower the cost on working families. You can make up the loss of revenue to the government by cutting spending.

Money is tight. Jobs are tighter. Fuel costs, loaded down with high taxes, are a huge contributor for the economy being in the dumps. We do not need a higher tax to put even more downward pressure on the economy making it worse for working families. We need to be set free from higher costs.

In 1953, President Eisenhower nominated then GM CEO Charles Wilson, to be Secretary of Defense. During a hearing for his confirmation, Mr. Wilson, in response to a question about GM, said “ I have always thought that what was good for the country was good for GM and vice versa”. (this is really what he said not what has been attributed to him all these years)

There lies what we need today Mr. Akerson.

What’s good for the country is having a government that’s not pushing down on our necks choking us to death with high taxes and overreaching regulation. GM was strong and powerful the world over, selling quality cars that people wanted when that environment existed. Taxes need to be low and government spending needs to be slashed and controlled by balanced budget amendments while onerous regulations need to be eliminated.

That’s good for country and the GM – and vice versa.

Support these policies and get the economy rolling. Create jobs and give people opportunities again so people can buy more cars. That is what we need. Not more burdens of taxes and regulations.

Mr. Akerson, come back to the real world and drop the ridiculous tax hike talk. Concentrate on building quality cars again. Help us out. We need it.

Oh, and please pay us back every dollar you owe us!

More Head Shakers

Here are a couple more car stories where you just have to shake your head and wonder…..

JEEP OWNERS CALL FOR RECALL

Using online websites, Internet forums, fan sites and You Tube an ever-growing group of Jeep owners around the country have been calling on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to – recall their vehicles!

Now, I don’t know how many of you have ever had to go through a recall – I have and take my word – it is not fun. In fact, it is a royal pain in the backside! I can say without hesitation, I do not ever want to go through that frustration again.

So I have to ask, how bad does it have to be for an owner of a vehicle to beg the government to recall their vehicle and go through all of that?

The problem concerns fuel overflow issues on gas tanks affecting most Jeep models, but centered mostly on 2007 and 2008 Jeep Wranglers. Chrysler has recalled some Dodge Durango’s for the same problem but they deny any problems with Jeeps.

The complaints are that even after the gas pump clicks off, gas spurts out of the fuel cap soaking the vehicle, the vehicle owner and the pavement. It is so bad and happens so often that many Jeep owners are not filling their tanks completely full to avoid being drenched in fuel.

Chrysler says the problem is that owners are using fuel with high ethanol levels. Their testing shows that a plastic “O” ring on the inlet valve that is supposed to stop the fuel from gushing out, swells when soaked in ethanol thereby causing the problem.

Ok, so in the scheme of things this may not be the biggest, scariest or most threatening of problems. Certainly not when compared to many of the other recalls that have recently been made. But, it is annoying and one of those things that should just not be happening.

The vehicle owner has no choice in the level of ethanol their fuel contains, so how can they do anything to alleviate this. And besides, should Jeep have not foreseen this problem?

Chrysler has already recalled the Durango for the same problem. Why not a recall for these Jeeps?

The best Jeep could muster is too issue some service bulletins, which means they will only fix the problem if the owner brings it to the dealers attention – and pays for it. The NHTSA says no recall because Jeep owners generated the interest in the issue over the Internet and it would. What?

I have to ask again. How many years has Jeep been manufacturing vehicles? All those years and they still can’t get some thing as simple as the fuel process right?

You just have to shake your head.

IS IT JETSON TIME?

This is a good head shaker.

Remember that cartoon The Jetsons? The way they flew around in their own mini – spaceships. As a kid, I was sure we would all be doing that by now.

Well, we may have taken the first step in that direction – finally – kind of.

The U.S. Department of Transportation has granted a legal exemption to the Terrafugia Company that will allow their Transition model to be driven on the road.

Why is this a big deal? Well, the Terrafugia Transition is actually a two-seat prop plane that turns into a vehicle able to be driven on the highway at proper highway speed, when not flying through the air.

It’s a flying car!

I call it that anyway. The company calls it a “roadable vehicle”. Trust a bureaucratic corporation to put a downer on it. Flying car – roadable vehicle – come on – It’s a flying car for goodness sake. Go with it!

The flying car includes automotive safety features like crumple zones and even airbags.

The Transition has successfully completed several test flights and is expected to enter production in 2012. Where do I sign up?

No word on whether you get a dog named Astro with each purchase.

What’s next, buildings mounted on the top of poles?

Just Shake Your Head #1

Every once in a while, you have an experience that causes you too just shake your head with wonder.

Like the other day while driving my kids to school, a car next to me started to drift into my lane. As I moved over, to counter the move, I looked over at the lane intruder ready to launch a verbal barrage of histrionics when I saw some thing that totally shocked me. There, right there, in the now correcting back into his lane car, was a man brushing his teeth while looking in his rear view mirror! If that was not bad enough, just then, he opened his door, while moving at around 35 miles-per-hour, and…. spit.

Words escaped me at that moment. I just had to shake my head and wonder – what in the world can he be thinking?

For eleven years I tolerated a round trip commute of fifty-two miles a day. In that time I observed many fellow commuters doing some pretty amazing, and dumb things while driving. Women putting on make-up, men shaving, clothes being changed, but never some one brushing their teeth then spitting while still driving.

For all of those incidents, I just had to shake my head.

Such is the case with one of the latest recalls by the car manufacturers.

Recently, General Motors has had to recall a number of their Chevrolet Cruze compact cars due to, are you ready for this – the steering wheels not being properly installed. It seems that they were not attached tightly enough. The result – they can literally come off in your hands while driving!

So, imagine this, your driving down the road in your brand new 2011 Chevy Cruze. You’re enjoying the spring day driving with the windows down on your way to your mother’s house to show her your new purchase. You’re proud of the fact that you’re helping out Government Motors by purchasing one of their cars instead of a Toyota Corolla, the main competitor.

You approach the correct street. You see an opening in the on- coming traffic so you speed up a little to make a quick turn and just as your starting to turn the steering wheel onto mom’s street – it comes off in your hands! Now you’re in the street having started to turn and you have no steering wheel and traffic is approaching. That is what I call a driver’s nightmare! And it happened to at least one owner of a 2011 Chevrolet Cruze.

Now if that situation is not scary enough, the explanation of why it happened provided by Chevrolet to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) might be even worse.

According to Chevrolet, it traced the problem to the fact that the wrong steering wheel was put onto the car while on the assembly line. What? The wrong steering wheels in a plant that manufacturers the Cruze. Scary.

Later, how much later we do not know for sure, when the problem was discovered, the correct wheel was installed. However, the new wheel was not attached properly. It was not tightened enough.

So lets review. GM’s manufacturing plant – where the Cruze is being built – had the wrong steering wheel in place for assembly on the Cruze. No one notices this and the wrong wheel is attached. How many wrong wheels were attached? Well the recall is for 2,100 cars so we can assume that at least that many cars had the wrong wheel installed. Finally, the problem is discovered and the correct wheels are installed but, those wheels, or at least one of them, are not attached properly. How does this happen?

You just have to shake your head.

One must ask – how long has Chevrolet / GM been making cars?

General Motors has been building cars since 1908 and Chevrolet since 1911. I will take a leap here and guess that in all of that time, most, if not all of the vehicles built by both have had steering wheels. And yet, here we are a hundred years later and they are having problems with the steering wheels.

As I have said before – these are the expert manufacturers that we are supposed to trust for all of our parts and service? These are the people that, according to them anyway, produce better parts than the independent aftermarket?

For some time now the original equipment manufacturers have been trying there hardest to scare the American people into believing aftermarket parts are inferior and even dangerous. All this sanctimonious talk from them and they can’t even get a steering wheel on right. Shame on them!

Makes you want to shake your head… and wonder.

Time for Used Tires

For almost as long as cars have been on the road there has been an ongoing debate about whether you should always buy a new car, or, never buy new and go with a used car every time.  Both sides have good points to back-up their positions so the choice comes down to your own personal feelings. Must you have a new car always, or, can you go with something a little older and save money. One thing is for sure, that debate will continue.

But there is another area of the vehicle that involves new versus used that has not received much attention. That is the purchase of used tires for your vehicle.

I know what you may be thinking. Used tires, how can you even think about putting used tires on your vehicle? That can’t be safe. Well actually, not only can it be safe, but it also can be a very cost efficient alternative in this day of four-dollar-plus a gallon gas and ever-rising costs for maintaining your vehicle.

My first contact with used tires goes back many years. My father owned a small construction company. He had several vehicles of different sizes including pick-ups, heavy-duty trucks, dump trucks and various tractors and heavy equipment that needed maintenance and tire changes on a regular basis. He always purchased used tires for them. To my knowledge, he never had a problem with them.

In addition, I had uncles that were farmers. They farmed hundreds of acres raising grain and cattle. They also bought used tires for all of their farm equipment – tractors, combines, pick-ups – all of them. Even then, with gas prices at  under or around a dollar, yes it has been that many years ago, and the cost of maintenance being much less, the use of used tires saved hundreds if not thousands of dollars every year. That savings mattered and made a difference.

I personally have purchased used tires for my own vehicles. After being told by my dad that the days of his paying for all the maintenance on the vehicle I was driving at home was at an end, and, that I was now paying for it myself, I quickly realized just how expensive maintaining a vehicle can be. Fortunately we had a family friend that owned a tire shop and he always helped to find the right tires for me. Used tires became part of my regular purchases and I never had a problem with them.

For some people, buying used tires presents a bad image. They believe that used tires have little or no tread left because, why else would they have been discarded. That is not always the case.

So, lets take a look at where they come from, and how you can find and use these tires in a safe economical way.

First, perhaps we should take a page out of the car manufacturers own playbook. Instead of calling these – used tires, which gives us a bad image, we will start calling them – previously owned tires. Hey it worked for the car companies.

Normally, all four tires should be replaced at a time. Many times however, just one or two tires show some excessive wear for whatever reason, so people, doing what is recommended, will replace all of the tires even though not all the tires suffer from excessive wear.

On other occasions, people decide they want a different type or look of tire so they replace them even though the older tires are still in good shape. These still good tires become nice – previously owned tires ready for use again.

The number one lesson about changing tires is – never ever replace just one. If one tire blows out or is seriously damaged in some way, or if a tire has excessive wear, you never replace just that one tire. You always replace two tires. So, you have a situation where only one tire was bad while the other is still fine. This also creates a nice previously owned tire inventory.

The key to any previously owned tire is the tread. When buying new tires, people do not usually check the tire tread, unless they want to see the design. They know, because it is new, that the tread will be “unused” or diminished from use. When looking at previously owned tires, you need to become a tread expert.

There is a very easy tried and true test to see if your previously owned tire has sufficient tread to keep you safe and sound while giving you miles and miles of economical driving. And, it turns out the tester is right in your pocket. It’s called the penny test.

Take a Lincoln head penny and hold it with the head facing down. Place your thumb and forefinger so it covers Lincoln’s body. Place Lincoln’s head into one of the grooves anywhere on the tire to check the evenness of the tread. If any part of Lincoln’s head is obscured by the tread you more than likely have a safe amount of tread. Run the penny around the tire or check points where it seems the tread maybe worn to a lower level. If you can see anywhere above the head including the words “In God We Trust,” there is not enough tread on the tire so move on to the next one.

Do not run tires with different tread patterns. Make sure the tires are the right size required by the manufacturer. This will make your ride smoother and the wear on the tires will be more even.

In addition too checking the tread, look carefully at the sides of the tires. Look for cuts or gouges, which may indicate that the tire has been damaged in an accident or driven against a curb at some time. A thinning of the tread on the side of a tire creates a higher probability of a blow out at some point.

If possible, look inside the tire for tire patches. Many times when a tire has been punctured, causing it to go flat, it can be repaired with a patch. This is a safe and easy repair done often in the country. If you find a patch, check it thoroughly to make sure it is still firmly attached to the tire with no rips or tears. A well-applied patch can out last the tire. Just make sure it is still properly in place.

Where can you find previously owned tires. Most garages, tire retailers and some car dealers keep a large selection of these tires on hand. Use their extensive expertise in helping you too select the right set of previously owned tires for your vehicle.

In this day of tight budgets previously owned tires are a safe and economical way to help keep your vehicle on the road. Go for it!

2011 – First 90 Day Review

Well, we have completed our first 90 days of the new – year, which means there is just 269 days until Christmas, or, just 45 days until the first Christmas commercials appear on TV or are heard on radio and, just 60 days until the stores start putting their Christmas displays out!  At least it seems that way.

I think, after the first 90 days of 2011, that it’s time to review how those sanctimonious saints of safety, otherwise known as the car manufacturers, are doing with their master manufacturing.

While the manufacturers continue with their national campaign to vilify aftermarket parts and gain a total monopoly for themselves, they continue to have a problem with recalls because of faulty products, poor assembly and shabby manufacturing.

How that can be when they claim to be the only ones qualified to manufacture all the parts on a vehicle? I do not know. It truly is a puzzle.

In the first 90 days of this year, there has been 28 recalls. That’s a recall every 3.2 days!

Those 28 recalls account for 523,005 vehicles being recalled in just the first 90 days of this year. That means – 40,231 vehicles are being recalled every week! …. So far.

Way to go you masters of manufacturing!

2010 was the fourth worst year for car recalls since the government started keeping records. Will 2011 challenge that standing? We shall see.

Keep coming here and we will let you know.

Monopoly in the Mail

One day this past week tucked in with my regular mail call of bills, coupons and friendly reminders of some thing I absolutely need too do, was a very nice looking flyer from my friendly Honda dealership.  The flyer stated that it was coming specifically from the Honda Authorized Tire Center. Sure enough, there were two very well produced pictures of technicians in very clean uniforms handling tires and tire accessories. Very professional and very nice indeed.

My first reaction was, when did they come up with an Authorized Tire Center for my Honda, or, any other make and model for that matter. As you know, if you have read any of the other articles on this site, and hopefully you have, I have already had a tough monopoly experience concerning the tires on my wife’s Honda van. The Honda dealership is the only place I can buy tires for the van resulting in extreme inconvenience and exorbitant costs. Still, I did not know about the Authorized Tire Center so, I read on.

The flyer tells me that I should not go to another tire dealer for my tire needs because the Honda dealer is the only place where I can find – “ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT TIRES made for your model.” It continues by telling me that the tires will be “installed by Honda-trained technicians, so you’ll get the tires designed for the model you drive.”

Most will see this as just a simple flyer trying to create some business for the dealer. I see some thing much deeper and more sinister at work here.  To me, this is just part of a continuing attack on the independent aftermarket in an attempt to coerce people back to the dealer for their maintenance and repairs – including tires.

The verbiage and pictures on this flyer imply just such a scenario. There is no talk about better prices or special deals. No language about convenient hours and being able to get in and out in a fast and easy manner, all things you might find in a regular sales flyer.

No, all the language here is about having – “ the original equipment tires made for your vehicle installed by Honda-trained technicians so you’ll get the tires designed for the model you drive”. It makes it sound as if none of the tens of thousands of independent tire dealers around the country can do the work correctly. Further, it implies that these independent dealers may not posses the right parts or equipment to do the tire job properly or carry the correct tires in their inventory

The wording of this flyer is clearly designed to make the vehicle owner think that the dealer is the only place you can get “the right repair or parts for the vehicle”. In the case of my wife’s van that is true, but only because they have a monopoly on my tires. In most cases, parts and tires can be found at any of the hundreds of thousands of independent repair locations around the country.

This mailing is just another part of a national campaign to create a monopoly for the car companies. For over seventeen years I have seen this campaign grow in force to the point that now, the car companies are even going after your tires. Think about that.

Remember, the independent aftermarket has existed in this country for nearly as long as there have been cars providing quality products at affordable prices. Do not be coerced by the car companies into thinking you can not get the right service, or the right parts from the aftermarket. Even tires.